Can you imagine the world’s reaction if they discovered that
Kobe had been
put down moments after breaking his ankle on the court? I don’t expect horses to draw the same
reaction that people do. That is not the
case and this is not a post attempting to draw you into an animal rights
discussion. I am not sure where this is
going, so let me throw a little knowledge at you.
Horses have very fragile legs. The reason is due to the way a horse
distributes its weight to the ground and the fact that horse anatomy is very
different from what most people think.
Horses are large animals. The
weight of their bodies against that of their legs is vastly different from that
of other quadrupeds. It makes them fast,
but it also makes their lower leg fragile simply because there is a small
amount of bone distributing that weight.
Another factor in horse health directly related to the leg has to do
with circulation. Horses are always
standing, they lay down occasionally, but mainly remain on their feet. This is because a horse needs to bear weight
on its legs to maintain proper circulation.
If they don’t have the proper amount of weight on a leg for an extended
period of time, blood does not circulate to the leg properly, and infections
will take root in the leg that would have otherwise been combated by proper
blood flow. So, if a horse injures a
leg, and is favoring it by not putting weight on it, it compounds the
problem. If it injures a leg, and you
resolve to aid in the blood flow by encouraging it to stand on the leg, it may
effect circulation in other legs. These
things do not always happen, but when they do they become very serious because
of the fragility of the lower leg and ankle bones.
As far as
the difference in anatomy is concerned, the structure of a horse’s leg is not at
all like ours. In fact, the anatomy of a
horse’s leg from the “knee” down is not like us. They do not have a “forearm”. Below a horse knee, the anatomy resembles
more of a human anatomy from the wrist down.
The cannon bone is actually a metacarpal, like a in the palms of our
hands and the pasterns are like our fingers.
The “ankle” is actually the fetlock, and it is not so much and ankle as
it is another digit in a finger. So a
lot of pressure is applied to these bones, particularly at speed, and that adds
to their fragility.
So, what is
wrong with these horses? Well, to give
you a short answer, I think breeders are breeding animals larger than their
breed characteristics can support and creating a pattern of unsound animals. What do I mean by that? Well, Thoroughbreds are streamlined animals
being bred for speed. To streamline them
and make them faster they are trying to maximize the amount of muscle and
animal can carry. They are overloading
the skeletal structure of the animal.
Thoroughbreds as a breed tend to have small legs and small hoof
diameter. People are attempting to raise
larger Thoroughbreds for the same reason Randy Moss runs past double coverage,
a longer stride carries you further per stride than a shorter one. They are making them too big for their feet
to adequately support. Thoroughbred
racing (according to Wikipedia) is seeing about 2 fatal injuries for every 1000
horses that start a race. In California, where the
weather allows a longer racing season, they are seeing about 4.
But that is
only part of the reason. Another big
part of the fragility of Thoroughbreds is inbreeding. This has always been an argument against the
Thoroughbred, and it is tough to shout down.
Why is inbreeding bad? Close
inbreeding or repeated inbreeding severely reduces the viability of zygotes by
packing the genetic makeup of the fertilized cell with recessive traits. Two places where this can become a calculable
problem for an organism is in the proper development of bone structure and
internal organs. Both of these problems
are endemic to Thoroughbreds.
Thoroughbreds often have improperly formed hearts and lungs and have
fragile bones or asymmetric bones.
Inbreeding
is widely embraced by the Thoroughbred breeders because of the financial gain
to be had from producing a winner. If a
breeder wants fast horses, he breeds his broodmares to fast stallions with a
record of producing winners. If he gets
a winner, that doesn’t necessarily mean that the winner will make a good stud
of winners. Often this is far from the
case. A stud with a good track record
will always find people willing to pay the stud fee, and since he can stand
stud for several years, he has the ability to impose his genetics of several
generations. Often he will find himself
being applied to his own progeny.
To name
drop and bring this a little closer to home for you, let me mention Storm
Cat. Storm Cat is widely considered one
of the top Thoroughbred stud in the world.
In 2007, if your mare gave birth to a live foal sired by Storm Cat, you
owed Overbrook Farm a half a million. If
I could collect that kind of bank for working my magic, I would be well on my
way to building a laser capable of writing “Fuck the Patriots” on the moon. Anyway, Storm Cat has sired over 300 graded
and stakes winners. A mediocre racer
himself, Storm Cat has made a name for siring winners and, maybe more
importantly, siring great studs. To name a few would bring heavyweight stud
names like Hennessey, Tabassco Cat (who had a shot at the Triple Crown if he
hadn’t been bumped coming out of the gates), and Giant’s
Causeway. A slightly more
recent name in terms of studs producing winners would be Mr. Prospector. Mr. Prospector’s winners read like Yankee
Hall of Famers. His descendents include
Real Quiet, Red Bullet, Hansel, Grindstone, Thunder Gulch, Point Given, Afleet
Alex, Smarty Jones, Funncy Cide, Street Sense, Barbaro, War Emblem, Curlin, Big
Brown, Eight Belles, and Fusaichi Pegasus.
This guy sneezes Triple Crown winners.
Most of those horses will stand stud at some point, and will eventually
encounter Mr. Prospector’s genetics down the road. This isn’t a new occurrence. If you look at the pedigrees of many
Throughbreds you are going to see names like Native Dancer, Northern Dancer, Secretariat (THE most dominant athlete of all time),
Danzig, Bold Ruler, Nashua,
or Nearco. Many of your better winners
will not have the same name on the dam side and the sire side, but some
will. The lack of frequency on those
winners may account for their soundness, it may not. In many cases, though, you will be finding
the same names on either side of the pedigree, particularly the maternal
side. Good sires will effect horseracing
for generations. Bold Ruler created a
lot of good, winning stallions that made good studs. Secretariat is among them. Big Red himself was known as a great
broodmare sire, and his daughters cranked out a lot of winners. Breeders who want to avoid inbreeding have to
be careful and responsible. It is easier
for the big farms who keep lots of quality studs. Smaller farms have to take more risks to keep
producing good racehorses. A well bred
animal is generally more sound than an inbred animal. Still, if you have ever had dogs you know
that mutts tend to live the longest, and the top racehorse prospects tend to be
closely related. After a generation or
two that will become problematic. In a grand punctuation of my point, it is rumored that Giant's Causeway will stand to Rags to Riches, the 2007 filly who smote Curlin in the Belmont Stakes, her first start against males. Both horses, GC and Rags, have Secretariat, Blushing Groom, and Nasrullah in their pedigrees, and from different angles I believe. In the end,
let me say this: horse people are freaking nuts. They are freaking nuts. Rich people with horses are nutty and poor
people with horses are nutty. Having a
horse is an expense in its own right, but when you are talking about hundreds
of millions of dollars worth of investment, which is what you are talking about
with some of these stud farms, you are going to find some nutty ass folks who
apply weird value to odd things. If the
high profile cases of Barbaro and Eight Belles have opened your eyes a deeper
inspection of Thoroughbreds will bring even more to light. For every Barbaro blowing a canon in the
Triple Crown there are three or four horses that break down that day you don’t
even know about. For every Eight Belles
that has to be put down after a bad break on raceday there are a half dozen
that get put down for laminitis a week after.
The only numbers that will scare you more than the numbers of euthanized
Thoroughbreds in racing are the numbers that people shell out to breed them
into fragility.
|
HELEN: I hear the fella owns a couple of racehorses. You know, trotters, like at Yonkers.
JERRY: Horses. They're like big riding dogs.
ELAINE: What about ponies? What kind of abnormal animal is that? And those kids who had their own ponies..
JERRY: I know, I hated those kids. In fact, I hate anyone that ever had a pony when they were growing up.
MANYA: ..I had a pony.
(The room is dead quiet)
JERRY: ..Well, I didn't really mean a pony, per se.
MANYA: (Angry) When I was a little girl in Poland, we all had ponies. My sister had pony, my cousin had pony, ..So, what's wrong with that?
JERRY: Nothing. Nothing at all. I was just merely expressting..
HELEN: Should we have coffee? Who's having coffee?
MANYA: He was a beautiful pony! And I loved him.
JERRY: Well, I'm sure you did. Who wouldn't love a pony? Who wouldn't love a person that had a pony?
MANYA: You! You said so!
JERRY: No, see, we didn't have ponies. I'm sure at the time in Poland, they were very common. They were probably like compact cars..
MANYA: That's it! I've had enough! (She leaves the room)
ISAAC: Have your coffee, everyone. She's a little upset. It's been an emotional day.
I watched a thing on ESPN the other day about horses and how they are genetically breeding them now. Taking the stud genes and implanting them into a "genetically empty" egg...they have grown quite a few of these horses already. I believe that the governing body that regulates horseracing does not allow them to race however...
I like Danzig.
You are right Morgan. The Thoroughbred breeders do not allow anything that resembles genetic modification other than selective breeding. They cannot artificially inseminate mares, they cannot collect eggs from fillies and implant them in other brood mares for gestation. And they absolutely cannot collect embryos and modify the zygote. Most of those things are only done in an attempt to corner the Thoroughbred market and keep smaller farms from getting good in a shorter period of time.
Sealed Tracks....heavy rains, sealing tracks leads to death of horses. Its been proven time and time again... Also, drugs kill horses.
Inbreeding has nothing to do with the poor quality of thoroughbreds in American horse racing. There seems to be a believe in the industry that this type of breeding produces speed.
The poor quality of american thoroughbreds is the fact that most of the quality horses are sent overseas to stud and the USofA is the only country that allows for their trainers to inject horses with quality drugs. The fact that horses are given masking agents as well as the infamous Lasik...only increases a horses ability to break dwon.
Storm Cat is a solid pony...but apparently he is all dried up as of this week. Pensioned.
You gave Mr. Prospector a lot of props, which is well deserved.
However, horses breaking down is part of the sport. It is not something that anyone wants to see happen and it is not something that I wish on any horse owner (or god forsaken any owner that just claimed a horse after it passed through the box and the horse breaks down before the new owner ever gets it back to his stall).
American Horse racing can be improved in several ways. The NTRA can provide more oversight for the entire racing industry. This would create a centralized rule agency that enforced penalities, imposed sanctions, created rules and made executive decisions to keep cheaters out of the sport.
The next line of business is to create a level playing field. This means the governing body eliminates all drugs and develops a testing process that ensures the horses go through universal regulations (such as the quarantine method of the breeder's cup) to ensure the races are truly equal.
Finally, jockeys should not be allowed whips. This is common on international turf and having watched several race provided by satellite tv...the quality of the races are great and probably even superior.
But...while you are thinking about things...horse racing in particular.
Just remember Casino Drive.
Casino Drive is, I believe, a half brother to Jazil (the most expensive colt ever) and Rags to Riches. A fine pedigree and he dominated the Peter Pan which I, unfortunately, had to watch on youtube much later. He has dominated the Japanese tracks and clearly, with the Peter Pan, has game experience at Belmont.
You are absolutely wrong to say that the best studs are overseas. IN FACT, the better studs stand stud here AND overseas. Good ones are generally owned by international farms and will stand stud here during the northern hemisphere breeding season and then be transported to the Middle East or Australia for the southern hemisphere breeding season.
You are correct in several accounts. They do need to stop dealing with sealed tracks. They aren't helping anyone and are inconsistent. Artificial turf and tracks is a better alternative, in my opinion, and Thoroughbred racing has to get over itself in that regard. Whips also, should be taken away and they should introduce better drug testing.
The notion, however, that they are not hurting Thoroughbreds with inbreeding is clearly the party line for horseracing apologists and degenerate gamblers and since you are a card carrying office holder in both groups, I am not surprised to see the argument from you.
They are selectively breeding horses that are too big for the diameter of their hoof. The characteristics of the breed cannot handle the size. They are inserting that size into the breed by narrowing the gene pool with bigger horses. I don't believe that any body has done a scientific study on the issue, but I believe a person that has been around some horses in their day can look at the size of the hooves at the track and the height of these horses and come to the conclusion that their hooves are too small.
I would be interested in knowing if there is any part of the first four paragraphs of this post you disagree with. I doubt there is. Only the inbreeding portion is called into question, and with that, I think the worst is yet to come. Storm Cat and Mr. Prospector are the Bold Giver of their day. The problem is that now, they make "the rounds" too often. Mr. Prospector is still going strong and Giant's Causeway and Fusaichi Pegasus are now the sought after studs. There is a very real chance that progeny are going to start meeting far early in the pedigree. I mean to say that instead of finding inbreeding three or four generations back with someone like Bold Giver or Blushing Groom showing up as a double great-grandsire, you could find someone like Prospector as a double grandsire. Inbreeding is not that big of a deal with smaller animals, but with larger animals it is far more dangerous. It is more likely to create deformaties or cardiovascular in larger animals and some of those problems won't always be visually apparent.
Does that mean I am speaking out against horseracing? No, if I lived within driving distance of Keeneland I would be there every weekend. I don't really care if Thoroughbred breeders run the breed into the ground, I just want to watch horseracing. I agree that horses become unsound, that is part of it, but you and I both know that Barbaro should have been pulled the instant he broke the gate. Did it contribute to the breakdown? I can't say, but he should have been pulled.
Barbaro would have been scratched from most races...however, the starter should have backed all of the horses out of the starting gate and the vet should have done his due diligence in properly inspecting the horse.
Absolutely, but even the inspection may not have shown injury. Where was the trainer? It was a judgement call situation. I believe the gallery at Hunter unanimously thought he had no chance of winning after breaking the gate. Surely we weren't the only ones.